In the Circuit Court of Benton County, Arkansas
Capps v. Carol Electric Cooperative Corporation
Case Number CIV 2009-1773-2
Brief Summary
This
class
action lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Benton County,
Arkansas on June 10, 2009. The Plaintiff seeks recovery on behalf of a
class of current and former members of Carroll Electric Cooperative
Corporation for
a portion
of more than $170 Million in patronage capital or capital credits owed
by former members of the Coop.
This lawsuit was only recently filed and in the very early stages of the litigation.
For a complete list of all the allegations see the Original Class Action Complaint.
Editorials

1984 revisited?
Open house -- insert sock
The Lovely County Citizen
Friday, July 3, 2009
One of the most dearly held tenets of living in a democracy is that
citizens have a right to speak out. Before major decisions are made,
normally public hearings are held where people speak out, expecting
that their views will be taken into consideration. . . .
It appears Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. (CECC) has gone one step
farther than the Delphi Technique. Although it is a non-profit,
member-owned cooperative, it doesn't even pretend to operate in a
democratic fashion. Members are not allowed to attend board meetings or
get full minutes of board meetings. Members are not allowed to speak or
ask questions at the annual meeting. And bylaws have been rewritten so
it's virtually impossible for members to nominate someone to the CECC
board or put a resolution before CECC members.
While claiming they are spraying herbicides to save money, CECC
board members (the only ones who get to decide who else is on the
board) are compensated at more than $30,000 per year, and last year
(not a good year for the economy!) handed the CEO a $100,000 per year
pay raise. And a recent lawsuit alleges CEO is hoarding members' money
for "unjust enrichment."
Service Area
Rural Electric Cooperatives provide electrical service to customers
within a geographical area know as a "Service Area" or "Service
Territory". These Service Areas often look like highly "gerrymandered"
political boundaries and occasionally there will be areas or pockets
withing the boundary where the Coop does not provide service like a
small town or city serviced by another electric utility.
Within these Service Areas the Coop typically has an effective monopoly with no meaningful competition.
According to its website, this is Carroll Electric's Service Area:
Coop Website
Most Rural Electric Cooperatives maintain websites but they rarely
provide material information about important aspects of their
operations. In fact this failure by a Coop to be forthcoming about its
policies involving patronage or capital credits is a red flag that its
policies and practices are suspect.
This is Carroll Electric's website: