Coop Litigation News

Tracking Legal Events involving Electric & Telephone Cooperatives

Home
Cooperatives
History of Coops
History of RECs
At Cost
Capital Credits
Health Cooperatives
News Tips
Questions
Legal
News
Cooperatives
Criminal
Issues
Lawyers
Litigation
Legislative
Opinion
Resources
Scholarship
States*
Support Groups
Home

Breaking News
Atlanta's Cobb EMC Sued for Millions in Capital Credits

Major Georgia, Texas Coops Reject Multimillion Dollar Buyout Offers

Oklahoma Jury Awards $20 Million Personal Injury Verdict

Louisiana Coop to Vote on Sale to Investor Owned Utility

Our Purpose:  To provide information to the Public in general and to Members of Rural Electric Cooperatives and Rural Telephone Cooperatives that are involved in civil lawsuits and related legal proceedings.



Formed during the 1930's in the depths of the depression to bring electric lights and power to farmers and their rural neighbors, many believe these modest cooperative enterprises have become massive economic juggernauts now run solely to benefit their managers and boards and have lost their way forgetting their original purpose.



We seek to provide useful information, documents, resources and pleadings about Rural Electric and Telephone Cooperatives in litigation to those interested -- primarily the owners of these Coops -- their members who are both past and present customers that bought electrical power and services from the Coops.

Incidentally since we've recently gotten a number of hits and inquiries about Health Cooperatives, we've decided to provide some coverage to these kinds of cooperatives.  Health Cooperatives aren't our primary focus but it seems to us that those in Washington contemplating the cooperative model for health care could learn loads from what we have to say about Rural Electric Cooperatives.

    We don't just cover pending civil lawsuits.

    If it deals with Rural Electric or Telephone Cooperatives and the law, we cover it:  Current and settled civil lawsuits; criminal investigations, grand juries and trials; new and proposed legislation; investigations by congress and state legislatures; news of member revolts; scholarly papers; opinions and editorials.

    We're your "go to" resource for all things Coop.


We have no axe to grind but must confess we have sympathy with the member owners of the Rural Coops.  These Coops are almost universally vast economic enterprises worth hundreds of millions of dollars that are unregulated monopolies who have no competition with no governmental oversight that set their own rates.  By law Coops cannot make a profit but must reduce rates or return any excess income over expenses to their customer owners.


Ask a Coop Question


Have a question about the Rural Electric Cooperative industry?  Rural Telephone Cooperative industry?  A particular Coop?  A Coop related term or concept?

We're in the news and information business so provide us with a question about something that you think would be of interest to our readers and we'll see if we can find an expery or a lawyer familiar with the industry to supply an answer.  Answers will be posted on line.


 

Have a News Tip?


Have a bright idea for a story?  Know of a resource we've missed?  Run across an interesting website.


We're in the news and information business so provide us with a story idea, a resource or a news article that you think would be of interest to our readers.




 

Scholarly Articles

Electric Co-Operatives:  From New Deal to Bad Deal?

Harvard Journal on Legislation

United States Congressman Jim Cooper

45 Harv. J. Leg. 335


Most people who live or work in rural America must buy their electricity from their local co-operative, a unique and largely unregulated type of utility.  Electric co-ops are owned by their customers who are called “members.”  This Policy Essay by Congressman Jim Cooper focuses  on the primary obligation electric co-ops owe their members: “at-cost” service, i.e., the lowest feasible electric bills.  To meet this obligation co-ops must provide low electric rates and timely return of equity.  They must also reduce the quantity of unneeded electricity purchased.  This Essay demonstrates that most distribution co-ops have a financial incentive to sell more electricity, not less.  It also shows that co-ops have sought to conceal information from their members—information to which owners are entitled in other business contexts.


America’s 930 electric co-operatives are the sole source of electricity for homes, farms, and businesses for parts of 47 states.  Although 66 co-ops also generate and transmit wholesale electricity (“G&Ts”), the 864 distribution co-ops (“co-ops”) simply resell and deliver electricity to retail customers across the crucial “last mile”  between the national electric power grid and the co-op members that ultimately use that electricity. Nationwide electrification is considered by engineers to be the greatest accomplishment of the twentieth century.  It is hard to imagine life without it.





Editorials


Carroll Electric Cooperative (Arkansas)


1984 revisited?
Open house -- insert sock

The Lovely County Citizen
Friday, July 3, 2009

One of the most dearly held tenets of living in a democracy is that citizens have a right to speak out.  Before major decisions are made, normally public hearings are held where people speak out, expecting that their views will be taken into consideration....

It appears Carroll Electric Cooperative Corp. (CECC) has gone one step farther than the Delphi Technique.  Although it is a non-profit, member-owned cooperative, it doesn't even pretend to operate in a democratic fashion.  Members are not allowed to attend board meetings or get full minutes of board meetings.  Members are not allowed to speak or ask questions at the annual meeting.  And bylaws have been rewritten so it's virtually impossible for members to nominate someone to the CECC board or put a resolution before CECC members.


While claiming they are spraying herbicides to save money, CECC board members (the only ones who get to decide who else is on the board) are compensated at more than $30,000 per year, and last year (not a good year for the economy!) handed the CEO a $100,000 per year pay raise.  And a recent lawsuit alleges CEO is hoarding members' money for "unjust enrichment."






PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE (Texas)

Many enablers led to indictments in scandal

Austin American-Statesman

Saturday, June 20, 2009


It took a civil case, a criminal investigation and relentless reporting by the American-Statesman to shed light on how the ousted leadership of the Pedernales Electric Cooperative spent ratepayer money.


All of that probing and digging resulted in a civil settlement, a stack of newspaper articles and now criminal indictments accusing Bennie Fuelberg, the former PEC general manager, and Walter Demond, the co-op's longtime legal adviser, of felonies. If convicted, both men are looking at lengthy prison terms.





Patronage & Capital Credits

Members and Capital Credits

Rural Electric and Telephone Cooperatives belong to the "Members" who have purchased electric or telephone service from the Coop.  This membership interest is based on Member equity investments known as "Capital Credits" or sometimes "Patronage Credits".  It has similarities to the ownership of stock in a conventional corporation.


Margins or Profits


Every month when a Member pays the bill for electric or telephone service, the Coop pays the expenses of providing that service.  Any funds left over at the end of the year are called "Margins" that in a conventional corporation would be "profit".  These Margins provide equity for the Coop and are allocated to the Members in proportion to their purchases during the year.  The Member's share of the Margins is the member's Capital Credits or Patronage Credits.


Virtually every state law that authorizes the formation of these cooperatives requires them to be operated "At Cost" and legally obligate the Coops to either:  (i) return the Margins to the Members or (ii) reduce rates for service to absorb the Margins.  This is not optional with the Coop and in fact the US Internal Revenue Code requires cooperatives to operate at cost to be considered non-profit and avoid taxation of these Margins.

News out of the Past


Cobb Electric Cooperative (Georgia)

"We are being swindled"

The Marietta Daily Journal
September 5, 2008

MARIETTA - Temperatures and tempers were hot Thursday morning at the 70th annual members meeting of the Cobb Electric Membership Corporation at its headquarters off Cobb Parkway.


A conflict of interest by Cobb EMC's President and CEO Dwight Brown and its board who also oversee nonprofit EMC's for profit subsidiary, Cobb Energy, were foremost on the minds of co-op members who voiced their frustration and asked board members to resign. . . .


Fletcher Thompson, a Marietta resident who represented Georgia in Congress for three terms beginning in 1967, was first at the microphone during new business. . . .


"We are being swindled," Thompson said. . . .


[MORE]



Recent News


Caddo Electric Cooperative (Oklahoma)

$20 Million Jury Verdict

In a case tried to a jury in Oklahoma State District Court in December 2009, the jury returned a verdict finding $20 Million in damages against Caddo Electric Cooperative.

The litigation involved a catastrophic accident that occurred in 2005 when one of the Coop's vehicles struck the automobile the plaintiff Mary Scott was in.  The court reduced the actual judgment amount to $12 Million because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.


Scott suffered a brain injury that requires constant medical attention.  The verdict, reached in Caddo County District Court is the largest verdict rendered in Oklahoma during 2009 and one of the largest jury verdicts ever rendered in the state of Oklahoma.  Caddo Electric is headquartered in Binger, Oklahoma.


While the issues in this case involving a motor vehicle accident are common and presently being litigated with several Coops, the size of the award in a conservative state like Oklahoma was remarkable.





Carroll Electric Cooperative (Arkansas)


Lawsuit accuses CECC of 'unjust enrichment" at the expense of members

The Lovely County Citizen
Friday, July 3, 2009

A lawsuit filed June 10 in Benton County against Carroll Electric [Cooperative] Corporation (CECC) alleges the company has oppressed shareholders and violated its fiduciary duties for unjust enrichment.


CECC spokeswoman Nancy Plagge had no comment on the lawsuit because it has not yet been reviewed by the CECC attorney.  The complaint by Joe Capps, of Siloam Springs, individually and on behalf of all other present and former coop members, said as a non-profit corporation, CECC cannot earn a profit.


$170 million


"The cooperative is obligated to pay by credits to a capital account for each patron, all such amounts in excess of operating costs and expenses," the complaint filed in Benton County Circuit Court states.  "Carroll Electric possess over $170 million of 'patronage capital' or 'capital credits.'  Carroll Electric pays neither interest nor dividends for use or on account of the patronage capitol ... the cooperative does not return patronage capital to former members, or excess capital to current members." . . .


The lawsuit alleges the board has irresponsibly endangered the coop's tax-exempt status by retaining the capital credits.




 
Cooperative Principles


The foundation of Coops are the cooperative principles which have been grafted into the law of every state in the union.

Statement on the Co-operative Identity

Definition

A co-operative is an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise.

Values

Co-operatives are based on the values of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity. In the tradition of their founders, co-operative members believe in the ethical values of honesty, openness, social responsibility and caring for others.

Principles

The co-operative principles are guidelines by which co-operatives put their values into practice.  There are seven:

  1. Voluntary and Open Membership
  2. Democratic Member Control
  3. Member Economic Participation
  4. Autonomy and Independence
  5. Education, Training and Information
  6. Cooperation among Cooperatives
  7. Concern for Community




History of Coops

Rural Electric &
Telephone Cooperatives

The rural electric cooperative system began 72 years ago as a New Deal program.  The Rural Electrification Administration (REA) provided subsidized loans to locally organized electric cooperatives and most of them started business and almost 100% debt capitalization.

Many states adopted electric cooperative corporation statutes based upon three variants of a model that is believed to have been drafted initially by the REA.  Most of the statutes do not define the term "cooperative" and require only nonprofit operation and a refund to members of revenues in excess of operating costs and certain reasonable reserves.

What it means otherwise to be a cooperative is a matter left largely to cooperative economic theory given sanction by federal tax law and the bylaws of most cooperatives which require operation "on a cooperative nonprofit basis".

In 1937, about the time electric cooperatives began to be formed, a federal government report defined "cooperative" as an enterprise "which belongs to the people who use its services, the control of which rests with all the members, and the gains of which are distributed to the members in proportion to the use they make of its services."  The REA subsequently defined an electric cooperative as a "a private, nonprofit enterprise, locally owned and managed, and incorporated under State law.  It is owned by the members it serves, and each member has one vote in the affairs of the cooperative, regardless of the amount of electricity he uses."

An asterisk (*) on a page label indicates that it is under construction.


This page was last modified on Sunday, January 31, 2010